<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Camp Chapman attack and the Blame Game</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Eyas</title><link>http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link> <dc:creator>Eyas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/#comment-122</guid> <description>But how does that relate to the topic at hand? I never mentioned palestine. And I sure as hell would be surprised if the GID did anything of value to the palestinians, but how is that relevant?Only two arguments are referred to here:
1. GID-CIA cooperation should be viewed as a terrorism-related activity, mainly because Jordan&#039;s history (starting from the &#039;70s)
2. It is in the CIA&#039;s best interest to continue seeking GID help.I cannot see how, in any imaginable way, is Jordan helping Palestinians relevant.For my &quot;pro-jordanian government posts&quot;. You are mixing two things up.
- My view of a peace treaty, negotiations, and the status of the Palestinian state is something coming from strong personal opinions, that I indeed backed up with a lot of reading. This is not a blind pro-jordanian government opinion, and if you read my post about &quot;More thoughts on the Arab-Israeli Conflict&quot;, as well as thoughts on the Gaza War, the Wall, the Goldstone report, etc. you&#039;ll understand where I&#039;m coming from (hopefully)
-I advocate the image of Jordan, in which certain events are greatly taken out of proportion on the expense of others. That, for instance, was the topic of the previous post.And I&#039;m glad you see the corruption in our regime and how it failed to assist palestinians in every step of the way. But don&#039;t disregard the corruption on the other side of the conflict, namely that of the &quot;sole representatives&quot; of the Palestinian peoples, and what their attitude to our regime was.I consider myself extremely pro-Palestinian. I just disagree with you on how the conflict is to be solved. I also disagree with you in basic evaluation of what is &quot;right&quot; and &quot;wrong&quot; in this conflict, and what is &quot;best&quot; and what would be &quot;bad&quot;. I am pro-peace, pro-compromise at this point. You can call me pro-failure, anti-cause if you want to (and I&#039;d disagree then), but give me the credit by  realizing that I say what I say because of what I believe, and not because of what the Jordanian government believes (for your sake, I might end up writing how I disagree with th e government, in fact). And neither do I believe what I believe because the Jordanian government believes it, or wants me to believe it. More on that, soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how does that relate to the topic at hand? I never mentioned palestine. And I sure as hell would be surprised if the GID did anything of value to the palestinians, but how is that relevant?</p><p>Only two arguments are referred to here:<br
/> 1. GID-CIA cooperation should be viewed as a terrorism-related activity, mainly because Jordan&#8217;s history (starting from the &#8217;70s)<br
/> 2. It is in the CIA&#8217;s best interest to continue seeking GID help.</p><p>I cannot see how, in any imaginable way, is Jordan helping Palestinians relevant.</p><p>For my &#8220;pro-jordanian government posts&#8221;. You are mixing two things up.<br
/> - My view of a peace treaty, negotiations, and the status of the Palestinian state is something coming from strong personal opinions, that I indeed backed up with a lot of reading. This is not a blind pro-jordanian government opinion, and if you read my post about &#8220;More thoughts on the Arab-Israeli Conflict&#8221;, as well as thoughts on the Gaza War, the Wall, the Goldstone report, etc. you&#8217;ll understand where I&#8217;m coming from (hopefully)<br
/> -I advocate the image of Jordan, in which certain events are greatly taken out of proportion on the expense of others. That, for instance, was the topic of the previous post.</p><p>And I&#8217;m glad you see the corruption in our regime and how it failed to assist palestinians in every step of the way. But don&#8217;t disregard the corruption on the other side of the conflict, namely that of the &#8220;sole representatives&#8221; of the Palestinian peoples, and what their attitude to our regime was.</p><p>I consider myself extremely pro-Palestinian. I just disagree with you on how the conflict is to be solved. I also disagree with you in basic evaluation of what is &#8220;right&#8221; and &#8220;wrong&#8221; in this conflict, and what is &#8220;best&#8221; and what would be &#8220;bad&#8221;. I am pro-peace, pro-compromise at this point. You can call me pro-failure, anti-cause if you want to (and I&#8217;d disagree then), but give me the credit by  realizing that I say what I say because of what I believe, and not because of what the Jordanian government believes (for your sake, I might end up writing how I disagree with th e government, in fact). And neither do I believe what I believe because the Jordanian government believes it, or wants me to believe it. More on that, soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eyas</title><link>http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link> <dc:creator>Eyas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/#comment-173</guid> <description>But how does that relate to the topic at hand? I never mentioned palestine. And I sure as hell would be surprised if the GID did anything of value to the palestinians, but how is that relevant?Only two arguments are referred to here:
1. GID-CIA cooperation should be viewed as a terrorism-related activity, mainly because Jordan&#039;s history (starting from the &#039;70s)
2. It is in the CIA&#039;s best interest to continue seeking GID help.I cannot see how, in any imaginable way, is Jordan helping Palestinians relevant.For my &quot;pro-jordanian government posts&quot;. You are mixing two things up.
- My view of a peace treaty, negotiations, and the status of the Palestinian state is something coming from strong personal opinions, that I indeed backed up with a lot of reading. This is not a blind pro-jordanian government opinion, and if you read my post about &quot;More thoughts on the Arab-Israeli Conflict&quot;, as well as thoughts on the Gaza War, the Wall, the Goldstone report, etc. you&#039;ll understand where I&#039;m coming from (hopefully)
-I advocate the image of Jordan, in which certain events are greatly taken out of proportion on the expense of others. That, for instance, was the topic of the previous post.And I&#039;m glad you see the corruption in our regime and how it failed to assist palestinians in every step of the way. But don&#039;t disregard the corruption on the other side of the conflict, namely that of the &quot;sole representatives&quot; of the Palestinian peoples, and what their attitude to our regime was.I consider myself extremely pro-Palestinian. I just disagree with you on how the conflict is to be solved. I also disagree with you in basic evaluation of what is &quot;right&quot; and &quot;wrong&quot; in this conflict, and what is &quot;best&quot; and what would be &quot;bad&quot;. I am pro-peace, pro-compromise at this point. You can call me pro-failure, anti-cause if you want to (and I&#039;d disagree then), but give me the credit by  realizing that I say what I say because of what I believe, and not because of what the Jordanian government believes (for your sake, I might end up writing how I disagree with th e government, in fact). And neither do I believe what I believe because the Jordanian government believes it, or wants me to believe it. More on that, soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how does that relate to the topic at hand? I never mentioned palestine. And I sure as hell would be surprised if the GID did anything of value to the palestinians, but how is that relevant?</p><p>Only two arguments are referred to here:<br
/> 1. GID-CIA cooperation should be viewed as a terrorism-related activity, mainly because Jordan&#8217;s history (starting from the &#8217;70s)<br
/> 2. It is in the CIA&#8217;s best interest to continue seeking GID help.</p><p>I cannot see how, in any imaginable way, is Jordan helping Palestinians relevant.</p><p>For my &#8220;pro-jordanian government posts&#8221;. You are mixing two things up.<br
/> - My view of a peace treaty, negotiations, and the status of the Palestinian state is something coming from strong personal opinions, that I indeed backed up with a lot of reading. This is not a blind pro-jordanian government opinion, and if you read my post about &#8220;More thoughts on the Arab-Israeli Conflict&#8221;, as well as thoughts on the Gaza War, the Wall, the Goldstone report, etc. you&#8217;ll understand where I&#8217;m coming from (hopefully)<br
/> -I advocate the image of Jordan, in which certain events are greatly taken out of proportion on the expense of others. That, for instance, was the topic of the previous post.</p><p>And I&#8217;m glad you see the corruption in our regime and how it failed to assist palestinians in every step of the way. But don&#8217;t disregard the corruption on the other side of the conflict, namely that of the &#8220;sole representatives&#8221; of the Palestinian peoples, and what their attitude to our regime was.</p><p>I consider myself extremely pro-Palestinian. I just disagree with you on how the conflict is to be solved. I also disagree with you in basic evaluation of what is &#8220;right&#8221; and &#8220;wrong&#8221; in this conflict, and what is &#8220;best&#8221; and what would be &#8220;bad&#8221;. I am pro-peace, pro-compromise at this point. You can call me pro-failure, anti-cause if you want to (and I&#8217;d disagree then), but give me the credit by  realizing that I say what I say because of what I believe, and not because of what the Jordanian government believes (for your sake, I might end up writing how I disagree with th e government, in fact). And neither do I believe what I believe because the Jordanian government believes it, or wants me to believe it. More on that, soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nayef</title><link>http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link> <dc:creator>Nayef</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:37:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/#comment-120</guid> <description>Eyas I suggest reading &quot;Collusion across the Jordan&quot;. We all know our regime has never helped the Palestinians. Neither the ones living in Palestine nor the ones living in Jordan.We all know how pro-Israeli our country has been ever since 1948.The posts are very pro-Jordaninan government.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eyas I suggest reading &#8220;Collusion across the Jordan&#8221;. We all know our regime has never helped the Palestinians. Neither the ones living in Palestine nor the ones living in Jordan.</p><p>We all know how pro-Israeli our country has been ever since 1948.</p><p>The posts are very pro-Jordaninan government.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nayef</title><link>http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link> <dc:creator>Nayef</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/2010/01/camp-chapman-attack-and-the-blame-game/#comment-172</guid> <description>Eyas I suggest reading &quot;Collusion across the Jordan&quot;. We all know our regime has never helped the Palestinians. Neither the ones living in Palestine nor the ones living in Jordan.We all know how pro-Israeli our country has been ever since 1948.The posts are very pro-Jordaninan government.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eyas I suggest reading &#8220;Collusion across the Jordan&#8221;. We all know our regime has never helped the Palestinians. Neither the ones living in Palestine nor the ones living in Jordan.</p><p>We all know how pro-Israeli our country has been ever since 1948.</p><p>The posts are very pro-Jordaninan government.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 216/220 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.eyas-sharaiha.com @ 2012-02-06 11:03:05 -->
