Archive for January 13th, 2009

Conflict in Gaza

As if an anti-humanitarian siege wasn’t enough, our peaceful neighbors have done it again, this time with a full-fledged war against the (people?) of the Gaza strip.

Israel – as any sovereign entity – has the right to exist, granted. Israel – as any other nation – has the right to defend itself, again: granted. But these two statements cannot justify an entire military operation with the magnitude of what is going on now, because they are irrelevant.

Is Hamas’s decision to fire al-Qassam rockets at southern Israel wrong? Sure it is. Does Israel have the right to defend itself from ‘attacks’? Yes it does. But: how can THIS be seen as a self-defense act?

From the ‘hundreds’ of Qassam rockets fired at Israel, only 3 Israeli civilians died. My deepest condolences to their families, really. But how can the death of 3 prompt a massacre being launched against Gaza? How can the death of 3 citizens justify the death of 915 from Gaza? Why is Palestinian blood being considered that cheap? Its normal for a government to value the lives of its citizens, but when 3 civilian lives are valued more than nine-hundred-something (and still rising) lives on the other side, something is unjust.

Israel isn’t attacking Hamas, its attacking the people of Gaza. Maybe it doesn’t mean to attack them – but the bottom line is: the people of Gaza are the ones suffering, so what is the point really?

Israel is breaking the Fourth Geneva Convention, which it ratified, because its military actions and hostilities are collective measures that fail to distinguish between civilians and militias (the “hostile entities”).

The head of the UNRWA in Gaza made an emotional televised appeal yesterday, I recommend you search for it.

And here’s a nice statistic: for every Israeli that dies (that is, including members of the Army), 71 Palestinians are killed by the Israeli forces in the Gaza conflict. When taking the entire Arab-Israeli conflict into consideration, Ehud Olmert states that – in 2008 – for every Israeli killed by Palestinians, 25 Palestinians were killed by Israel. TAKE THAT, Human Rights!

Windows 7

Starting with Windows Vista, Microsoft began producing what I call a “new generation” of products that are – quite frankly – pretty impressing. I guess the continued delays of Windows Vista, as well as the rough time launching it, has left a prominent impact on the entire company, perhaps a “story of warning” told to other employees. During the development of Windows Vista, Microsoft hit rock bottom, and from what I’m seeing now, it has dramatically changed the company’s direction – to the better.

Don’t get me wrong, I do not think that Vista – as a product – represents “rock bottom” for Microsoft (THAT would’ve been Bob); its an excellent improvement in my view, but the development cycle it has gone through is rather horrible, and Microsoft openly admits to that.

ANYWAYS, back to the topic: Windows 7.

Before talking about the UI, I guess, in my opinion, the most important changes that have occurred to the OS are those that are under the hood. The memory footprint is surprisingly low, the speed is rather amazing, power efficiency is notably improved, etc. From that respect, MS did a good job really.

The UI is an advancement in many ways, but somehow the new changes can make a person feel foreign to the OS; I like it and can use it well, but I still don’t feel “right at home” when using it. I guess some UI changes are perhaps a bit too radical (and maybe that’s good for the long term) and thus take some time to get used to.

When it comes to stability, reliability, and performance, Windows 7 is the OS to beat. When it comes to UI, intuitiveness, and ease of use, I guess that’s when it becomes debatable.

Overall, I’d still like to say I love the new direction Microsoft is going through, the Zune, the Windows Live stuff, and now Windows 7… kind of hard to believe that this is the same company that existed 11 years ago.